Child support calculations in Arizona are governed by the Arizona Child Support Guidelines. \u00a0 These Guidelines establish a formula for calculating child support which family court judges must follow except in rare circumstances. \u00a0So is figuring out child support always simple in Arizona cases? \u00a0The answer is yes. \u00a0And no. \u00a0Once the variables which go into the formula are determined, calculating child support is easy, but it is not always so easy to determine the variables on which child support calculations are based.<\/p>\n
The primary Arizona child support statute is A.R.S. Sec. 25-320. \u00a0Subsection D requires the Arizona Supreme Court to “establish guidelines for determining the amount of child support.” The supreme court must review the guidelines at least every four years “to ensure that their application results in the determination of appropriate child support amounts.” A.R.S. Sec. 25-320.D. \u00a0A committee of mostly lawyers drafts, reviews and revises the Guidelines approximately every four years as the statute requires, and the supreme court then reviews–and usually approves\/adopts–the revised Guidelines.<\/p>\n
Under the Guidelines, there are several factors which influence child support calculations in Arizona, including the following: \u00a01) the monthly\u00a0gross<\/em> income of each parent; 2) the number of children involved; 3) the parenting time schedule; 4) the cost of medical insurance for the child(ren); and 5) the work-related child care expenses for the child(ren). \u00a0When parents argue over child support calculations in Arizona, they rarely argue over formula or calculation itself. \u00a0Rather, they argue over the numbers–one or more of the variables outlined above–which affect the calculation.<\/p>\n The most common argument parents have is over the income for one or both parents to be used in the child support calculation. \u00a0For example, when one parent does not work and has no income, that parent may wish to have child support calculated based on a zero income for him or her. \u00a0 Under the Guidelines, however, when a judge determines a parent is not working “as a matter of choice and not for reasonable cause, the court may\u00a0attribute<\/em> income to a parent up to his or her earning capacity.” \u00a0Guidelines, Section 5.E (emphasis added). \u00a0As you may imagine, the two parents will normally have drastically different opinions and evidence to present as to the “earning capacity” of the non-working parent.<\/p>\n Parents also frequently argue over whether bonus, overtime or shift-differential pay should be included in a parent’s income for child support calculation purposes. \u00a0The parent who has earned the extra income of course does NOT want the extra income counted in the child support calculation. \u00a0The other parent argues it should be counted in the calculation. \u00a0The Guidelines do provide some guidance on these extra-income components, but ultimately the judge must decide whether to “count” such extra income for purposes of the child support calculation unless the parents can agree.<\/p>\n Another difficult challenge is the self-employed parent. \u00a0Sole proprietors and other owners of closely-held businesses usually have the ability to drastically influence the business profit shown on their financial statements and income tax returns. \u00a0For example, cash payments may never be deposited into business bank accounts and therefore never hit the books. \u00a0Work may be done by the business in trade or barter for non-cash benefits. \u00a0Personal expenses may be passed through as business expenses, artificially deflating the true business profits.<\/p>\n In one case, I discovered that my client’s husband, a diesel mechanic, was putting lingerie and hotel overnights with his mistress on a business credit card and then paying the card out of a business bank account. \u00a0He believed his business profit was the amount of money left over after paying his business credit card. \u00a0 He soon learned, however, that it’s hard to convince a child support judge that maintaining a mistress is an ordinary and necessary business expense for a diesel mechanic.<\/p>\n In cases where a self-employed person has gone to extensive efforts to hide<\/em> his true income, examination of business records by the lawyer alone may not be sufficient. \u00a0Sometimes it is necessary to hire a forensic accountant to scrutinize the self-employed parent’s bank accounts, financial statements, \u00a0tax and other \u00a0business records in order to get a clear picture of the parent’s real income.<\/p>\n The potential for litigation over the parents’ incomes in child support calculations is almost limitless. \u00a0 Once the parties agree on–or the judge determines–the parents’ incomes and the other critical variables, however, running the child support formula to calculate child support is a simple process which can be performed in just a few minutes, either manually or using an automated child support calculator.<\/p>\n If you need assistance calculating child support in your case, please contact my office to schedule a meeting with me. \u00a0I can easily run a child support calculation for you based on the income and other figures you provide me during our initial consultation.<\/p>\n Copyright \u00a9 2014, 2021, 2023 by Scoresby Family Law \u2013 J. Kyle Scoresby, P.C. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n You can also watch my video on child support below.<\/p>\n